Real Fags Join The Priesthood?

Posted: December 22, 2011 in Fag Up!, homosexuality, Identity, Masculinities, Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/12/20/reasserting-the-priesthood-as-masculine/

The frankly annoyingly feminist Sociological Images referred to a recruitment video for the priesthood featured at NYPriest website.

The gender studies academics at S.I. said:

‘Usually, a male-dominated occupation wouldn’t be in need of having its masculinized character stressed so openly. However, the child sex abuse scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church in the U.S. and elsewhere have damaged the image of the priesthood. Not only did many priests sexually abuse children, but many of the abused children where boys. Had the abuse involved primarily girls girls in late childhood or their teens, the public may very well have expressed revulsion and disgust, but we also have cultural narratives available, such as the idea of the sexually precocious Lolita who entices men against their better judgement, that are often used to at least partially justify or explain adult men’s sexual attraction to or abuse of even young girls’

This really got my goat for two key reasons:

1) They are using hypothetical examples of girls being abused saying if it was girls being ‘sexually abused’ by men priests, people would come up with spurious justifications for it. And yet, the main reason this sexual abuse ‘scandal’ in the priesthood has been newsworthy is that the men doing the ‘abuse’ got away with it for years and years. It’s classic oppression olympics with girls and women always winning the gold victim status medal, even when they are made up examples!

2) The feminist analysis of ‘real men’ being used to ‘sell’ the priesthood is reductive and wrong. It ignores how men don’t just compare themselves to women but also to each other, and how the manly ‘real men’ discourse is fraught with tensions around homosexuality (which is a big part of sex in the priesthood) and how machismo is actually very camp.

 

Oh, and 3) ‘Fishers of Men’? is that what they call it now😀

Comments
  1. Lawrence says:

    Mark 1:16-20 “As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. ‘Come, follow me,’ Jesus said, ‘and I will make you fishers of men.’

    Was Jesus Christ the very first Gaylord?

  2. y’know something I’m not very proud of is the fact I went to a catholic hs….

    I stopped wearing deodorant-part of it was rebellion for not being able to wear what I wanted. My mom even told me that I stank. I had my reasons. Later, visiting my hometown, a priest scandal was on the news. I told my mom, remember how I didn’t wear deodorant back then? She said, yup. I said that’s why my butt is still cherry.

  3. elissa says:

    “Abusing boys undermines the assumption of heterosexuality that is essential to hegemonic masculinity.”

    What drek!

    Abusing boys undermines the love all fathers have for their own boys and the boys of other fathers just like them. That’s the problem with canned thinking. You pour it on everything, whether you need to or not.

    • They are almost saying it’s a good thing – because ‘hegemonic masculinity’ to them is the bad guy. So undermining it is good. Whereas men abusing girls supports ‘hegemonic masculinity’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s